Thursday, November 1, 2012
A look back
For my rhetorical analysis research paper, I chose to do offshore drilling as my topic. I chose this topic because I feel very strongly about it and felt like I could make a good point about it. I took a stance that supported offshore drilling. I took this stance because it is economically helpful. Without oil drilling, many people will be put out of a job and much economic revenue will be lost. This point was my main point in my paper. I used plenty of research for this point, but probably did not explain my argument as well as I should have. I also talked about the history of oil drilling all together and the history behind the BP oil spill. For these two points, I did some research but it was mostly me discussing what happened and my viewpoints. I then went on to talk about the environmental hazards that offshore drilling has. I talked about the damage and how evolution has created organisms to dissovle (eat) the oil. I did plenty of research on this and also added my viewpoints and explanations. Overall, I feel like I did not add enough of my own interpretation. When I add more explanation in my final draft, my paper will be very strong. However, my strong points are my research, which I did a lot of. I worked hard on it and gather both numbers and quotes. I inserted the quote where I felt like were great spots. Now, I just have to add interpretations and explanations and my paper will be strong.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment